People v. Vergara

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vergara

33 A.D.3d 563, 824 N.Y.S.2d 18

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 33 A.D.3d 563 (People v. Vergara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vergara, 33 A.D.3d 563, 824 N.Y.S.2d 18 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John G. Ingram, J.), rendered April 29, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the effective date of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) (People v Utsey, 7 NY3d 398 [564]*564[2006]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Marlow, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (John G. Ingram, J.), rendered April 29, 2004, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in or near school grounds, and sentencing him to a term of 2 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

The amelioration doctrine does not apply where, as here, a defendant was sentenced before the effective date of the Drug Law Reform Act (L 2004, ch 738) (People v Utsey, 7 NY3d 398 [564]*564[2006]). Concur—Tom, J.E, Andrias, Marlow, McGuire and Malone, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 A.D.3d 563, 824 N.Y.S.2d 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vergara-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack