People v. Veras

134 A.D.3d 963, 20 N.Y.S.3d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 16, 2015·No. 2012-02986·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered June 7, 2012, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contentions regarding the County Court’s Sandoval ruling (see People v Sandoval, 34 NY2d 371 [1974]) are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Mantock, 117 AD3d 753, 754 [2014]; People v McClain, 61 AD3d 703, 704 [2009]) and, in any event, without merit.

The defendant’s contention that his conviction was not supported by legally sufficient evidence is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Gray, 86 NY2d 10 [1995]). In any event, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review of the evidence pursuant to CPL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Balkin, J.P., Hall, Cohen and Hinds-Radix, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Veras, 134 A.D.3d 963, 20 N.Y.S.3d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

134 A.D.3d 963 (People v. Veras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. May
138 A.D.3d 1024 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2016)