People v. Veras
167 A.D.2d 978, 563 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16826
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Veras. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 A.D.2d 729 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 16, 1990·Published
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that the comment of the prosecutor on summation deprived him of a fair trial was not preserved for review and we find no reason to exercise our discretion to reach the issue in the interest of justice. The sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Veras, 167 A.D.2d 978, 563 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).
167 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Veras) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.