People v. Veras

167 A.D.2d 978, 563 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16826

This text of 167 A.D.2d 978 (People v. Veras) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Veras, 167 A.D.2d 978, 563 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16826 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant’s contention that the comment of the prosecutor on summation deprived him of a fair trial was not preserved for review and we find no reason to exercise our discretion to reach the issue in the interest of justice. The sentence imposed was not harsh and excessive. (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Erie County, Kubiniec, J.—robbery, second degree.) Present—Denman, J. P., Boomer, Pine, Balio and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 A.D.2d 978, 563 N.Y.S.2d 710, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 16826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-veras-nyappdiv-1990.