People v. Ventura

233 A.D.2d 154, 650 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11696
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Ventura. Read the opinion of the Court — 250 A.D.2d 403

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Leslie Crocker Snyder, J.), rendered September 8, 1994, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of manslaughter in the first degree and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of imprisonment of from 6 to 18 years and one year, respectively, unanimously modified, on the law, the conviction for manslaughter in the first degree vacated and the matter remanded for a new trial. As so modified, the judgment is affirmed.

In unduly limiting counsel’s argument during summation, regarding the defense’s ricochet theory, the trial court failed to afford counsel the widest latitude in advocating his cause (see, People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105,109), and erroneously concluded that he was making himself a ballistics expert. The record reflects that counsel’s ricochet theory was reasonably based upon evidence adduced at trial, including the testimony of the People’s ballistics expert and of the medical examiner and the crime scene photographs. Given the possible prejudicial effect on the defense, a new trial on the manslaughter count is warranted. We have considered defendant’s other points and find them to be without merit. Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Ventura, 233 A.D.2d 154, 650 N.Y.S.2d 2, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11696 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

233 A.D.2d 154 (People v. Ventura) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ashwal
347 N.E.2d 564 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)