People v. Venable

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Venable

31 A.D.3d 968, 817 N.Y.S.2d 921

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 20, 2006

StatusPublished

This text of 31 A.D.3d 968 (People v. Venable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Venable, 31 A.D.3d 968, 817 N.Y.S.2d 921 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered January 24, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant comprehensively waived his right to appeal orally and in writing, and pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to 4V2 to 13V2 years in prison. On appeal, assigned counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and appellate counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Eidens, J.), rendered January 24, 2003, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In satisfaction of a four-count indictment, defendant comprehensively waived his right to appeal orally and in writing, and pleaded guilty to the reduced charge of attempted criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree. He was sentenced in accordance with the plea agreement to 4V2 to 13V2 years in prison. On appeal, assigned counsel for defendant seeks to be relieved of her assignment on the ground that there are no nonfrivolous issues that can be raised on appeal. Upon our review of the record, we agree. The judgment is, accordingly, affirmed and appellate counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted (see People v Cruwys, 113 AD2d 979 [1985], lv denied 67 NY2d 650 [1986]; see generally People v Stokes, 95 NY2d 633 [2001]).

Mercure, J.E, Spain, Carpinello, Lahtinen and Kane, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A.D.3d 968, 817 N.Y.S.2d 921, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-venable-nyappdiv-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack