People v. Velez

240 A.D.2d 685, 659 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6778
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Velez. Read the opinion of the Court — 222 A.D.2d 539

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (LaCava, J.), rendered March 18, 1994, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the [686]*686defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress identification testimony.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The hearing court properly determined that the police officers had a reasonable suspicion that the defendant committed a crime, thus authorizing the forcible stop and detention of the defendant (see, People v De Bour, 40 NY2d 210, 223). Moreover, the court properly determined that the showups made at the scene of the crime, which occurred while the defendant was handcuffed in the rear of a police car, were not so unnecessarily suggestive as to create a substantial likelihood of misidentification (see, People v Duuvon, 77 NY2d 541).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, including those raised in his supplemental pro se brief, are either unpreserved for appellate review (see, CPL 470.05 [2]) or without merit. Miller, J. P., Sullivan, Joy and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velez, 240 A.D.2d 685, 659 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6778 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

240 A.D.2d 685 (People v. Velez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. De Bour
352 N.E.2d 562 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
People v. Duuvon
571 N.E.2d 654 (New York Court of Appeals, 1991)