People v. Velez

124 A.D.2d 761, 508 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62078
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Velez. Read the opinion of the Court — 100 A.D.2d 603

Opinion

The attempted introduction of testimony that the defendant was found with "slips of paper”, which may have constituted betting slips, for which he was not indicted, did not serve to deny him a fair trial. The defense counsel’s objection was immediately sustained, and a curative instruction was promptly given. In light of the overwhelming evidence of guilt, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

The defendant has not called our attention to any error with respect to the conviction upon his plea of guilty, and therefore, that conviction is also affirmed. Brown, J. P., Rubin, Lawrence and Kooper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velez, 124 A.D.2d 761, 508 N.Y.S.2d 258, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 62078 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

124 A.D.2d 761 (People v. Velez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.