People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Velez

65 A.D.2d 630, 409 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13344

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 30, 1978

StatusPublished

This text of 65 A.D.2d 630 (People v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Velez, 65 A.D.2d 630, 409 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, one rendered June 9, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and the other, rendered June 10, 1977, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals by defendant from two judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County, one rendered June 9, 1977, convicting him of robbery in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence, and the other, rendered June 10, 1977, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. Judgments affirmed. We have reviewed the record and agree with appellant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious grounds which could be raised on this appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631). Suozzi, J. P., Gulotta, Shapiro and Margett, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 630, 409 N.Y.S.2d 709, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-velez-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack