People v. Velez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Velez

10 A.D.2d 619, 200 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 16, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 619 (People v. Velez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Velez, 10 A.D.2d 619, 200 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, [620]*620without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the indictment shall be substituted in place, of the original indictment, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant's points upon the District Attorney of New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 29, 1960, with notice of argument for the May 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York, N. Y. is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion granted insofar as to permit the appeal to be heard on the original record, [620]*620without printing the same, except that a certified copy of the indictment shall be substituted in place, of the original indictment, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellant’s points, on condition that the appellant serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellant's points upon the District Attorney of New York County, and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies thereof, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 29, 1960, with notice of argument for the May 1960 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Anthony F. Marra, Esq., 100 Centre Street, New York, N. Y. is assigned as counsel for the appellant for the purposes of the appeal. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel, Rabin, M. M. Frank and Valente, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 619, 200 N.Y.S.2d 329, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-velez-nyappdiv-1960.