Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Velazquez

People v. Velazquez

534 N.E.2d 29, 73 N.Y.2d 815, 537 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3464
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedDecember 15, 1988
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 534 N.E.2d 29 (People v. Velazquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Velazquez, 534 N.E.2d 29, 73 N.Y.2d 815, 537 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3464 (N.Y. 1988).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The undisturbed factual finding regarding propriety of the denial of defendant's suppression motion is supported by the record and therefore beyond further review. The Appellate Division having decided the suppression issue, we do not pass on the validity of defendant’s waiver. Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit or unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Reppert
814 A.2d 1196 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
People v. Smith
239 A.D.2d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Kelley
220 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Russo
201 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Frazier
156 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 N.E.2d 29, 73 N.Y.2d 815, 537 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-velazquez-ny-1988.