People v. Velazquez

534 N.E.2d 29, 73 N.Y.2d 815, 537 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3464
New York Court of Appeals·Decided December 15, 1988·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The undisturbed factual finding regarding propriety of the denial of defendant's suppression motion is supported by the record and therefore beyond further review. The Appellate Division having decided the suppression issue, we do not pass on the validity of defendant’s waiver. Defendant’s remaining arguments are without merit or unpreserved.

Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa concur.

Order affirmed in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Velazquez, 534 N.E.2d 29, 73 N.Y.2d 815, 537 N.Y.S.2d 112, 1988 N.Y. LEXIS 3464 (N.Y. 1988).

534 N.E.2d 29 (People v. Velazquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Commonwealth v. Reppert
814 A.2d 1196 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 2002)
People v. Smith
239 A.D.2d 219 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
People v. Kelley
220 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
People v. Russo
201 A.D.2d 940 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)
People v. Frazier
156 A.D.2d 583 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)