People v. Velardo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Velardo

80 A.D.3d 682, 914 N.Y.S.2d 671

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 18, 2011·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated March 11, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s only contention on this appeal, that the Supreme Court improperly assessed him five points under risk factor 14, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Marin, 48 AD3d 535 [2008]; People v Fredlund, 38 AD3d 636 [2007]; People v Barber, 29 AD3d 660 [2006]; People v Sinclair, 23 AD3d 537 [2005]). Skelos, J.P., Eng, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by the defendant from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Chun, J.), dated March 11, 2009, which, after a hearing, designated him a level two sex offender pursuant to Correction Law article 6-C.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The defendant’s only contention on this appeal, that the Supreme Court improperly assessed him five points under risk factor 14, is unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Marin, 48 AD3d 535 [2008]; People v Fredlund, 38 AD3d 636 [2007]; People v Barber, 29 AD3d 660 [2006]; People v Sinclair, 23 AD3d 537 [2005]). Skelos, J.P., Eng, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

People v. Velardo, 80 A.D.3d 682, 914 N.Y.S.2d 671 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

80 A.D.3d 682 (People v. Velardo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related