People v. Vega (Jorge)
Opinion
against
Jorge Vega, Defendant-Appellant.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of the Criminal Court of the City of New York, New York County (Carol R. Feinman, J.), rendered July 2, 2017, convicting him, upon a plea of guilty, of disorderly conduct, and imposing sentence.
Per Curiam.
Judgment of conviction (Carol R. Feinman, J.), rendered July 2, 2017, reversed, on the law, accusatory instrument dismissed, and surcharge, if paid, remitted.
As the People concede, defendant's conviction must be vacated since the plea record lacks the requisite "affirmative showing" that defendant understood and waived his Boykin rights (see Boykin v Alabama, 395 US 238, 242 [1969]; People v Tyrell, 22 NY3d 359, 365 [2013]). The People also agree that dismissal of the accusatory instrument is the appropriate corrective action in this particular case (cf. People v Conceicao, 26 NY3d 375, 385 n 1 [2015]).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE COURT.
I concur I concur I concur
Decision Date: October 11, 2018
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Vega (Jorge) (People v. Vega (Jorge)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.