People v. Veamatahau

California Supreme Court

People v. Veamatahau

425 P.3d 1006, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 792

CourtCalifornia Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 12, 2018

DocketS249872

StatusPublished

This text of 425 P.3d 1006 (People v. Veamatahau) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Veamatahau, 425 P.3d 1006, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 792 (Cal. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the prosecution's expert witness relate inadmissible case-specific hearsay to the jury by using a drug database to identify the chemical composition of the drug defendant possessed? Did substantial evidence support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11375, subd. (b)(2) )?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the prosecution's expert witness relate inadmissible case-specific hearsay to the jury by using a drug database to identify the chemical composition of the drug defendant possessed? Did substantial evidence support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11375, subd. (b)(2) )?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

425 P.3d 1006, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 792, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-veamatahau-cal-2018.