People v. Veamatahau

California Supreme Court

People v. Veamatahau

425 P.3d 1006, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 792

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Veamatahau. Read the opinion of the Court — 9 Cal. 5th 16 →

California Supreme Court·Decided September 12, 2018·No. S249872·Published

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the prosecution's expert witness relate inadmissible case-specific hearsay to the jury by using a drug database to identify the chemical composition of the drug defendant possessed? Did substantial evidence support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11375, subd. (b)(2) )?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition for review is granted. The issues to be briefed and argued are limited to the following: Did the prosecution's expert witness relate inadmissible case-specific hearsay to the jury by using a drug database to identify the chemical composition of the drug defendant possessed? Did substantial evidence support defendant's conviction for possession of a controlled substance ( Health & Saf. Code, § 11375, subd. (b)(2) )?

People v. Veamatahau, 425 P.3d 1006, 237 Cal. Rptr. 3d 792 (Cal. 2018).

Pincite

425 P.3d 1006 (People v. Veamatahau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.