People v. Vaughn

29 A.D.3d 609, 813 N.Y.S.2d 309
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vaughn. Read the opinion of the Court — 26 A.D.3d 776

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Rockland County (Kelly, J.), rendered June 20, 2002, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see CPL 470.15 [5]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for appellate review and, in any event, are without merit. Florio, J.P., Miller, Adams and Skelos, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vaughn, 29 A.D.3d 609, 813 N.Y.S.2d 309 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 609 (People v. Vaughn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)