People v. Vaughn

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vaughn

286 A.D.2d 354, 728 N.Y.S.2d 689, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7837

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 6, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 A.D.2d 354 (People v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vaughn, 286 A.D.2d 354, 728 N.Y.S.2d 689, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7837 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), imposed October 8, 1999, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was, in fact, imposed, was excessive (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825). Bracken, P. J., Altman, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Nassau County (Calabrese, J.), imposed October 8, 1999, on the ground that the sentence is excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed. No opinion.

The defendant knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived, without limitation, the right to appeal his conviction and sentence (see, People v Moissett, 76 NY2d 909; People v Seaberg, 74 NY2d 1). Since the defendant was informed of the maximum sentence which would be imposed pursuant to the plea agreement, his general waiver of his right to appeal encompasses his claim that the agreed-upon sentence, which was, in fact, imposed, was excessive (see, People v Lococo, 92 NY2d 825). Bracken, P. J., Altman, McGinity and H. Miller, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D.2d 354, 728 N.Y.S.2d 689, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vaughn-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack