People v. Vaughn
This text of 136 A.D.2d 752 (People v. Vaughn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (O’Brien, J.), rendered September 3, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the prosecutor’s remarks in summation did not deprive him of a fair trial. The defendant’s objection to the prosecutor’s characterization of a criminal trial as a search for the truth rather than a search for reasonable doubt was sustained by the trial court and immediate curative instructions were given thereby vitiating [753]*753any possible prejudice (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; People v Jalah, 107 AD2d 762). Moreover, the prosecutor’s remarks referring to a former baseball player in an attempt to imply that the defense had employed deceptive tactics were within the bounds of permissible rhetorical comment (see, People v Galloway, supra).
Finally, the defendant’s challenges to the propriety of the trial court’s jury charge are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Lawrence and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 A.D.2d 752, 524 N.Y.S.2d 88, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vaughn-nyappdiv-1988.