People v. Vatansever
This text of 5 A.D.3d 406 (People v. Vatansever) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 14, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
[407]*407Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to a public trial is not preserved for appellate review (see People v Casper, 287 AD2d 575 [2001]; People v Torres, 257 AD2d 639 [1999]), and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.05 [2]).
The defendant’s remaining contentions in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 A.D.3d 406, 771 N.Y.S.2d 910, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vatansever-nyappdiv-2004.