People v. Vatansever

5 A.D.3d 406, 771 N.Y.S.2d 910
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 1, 2004·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Gary, J.), rendered June 14, 2001, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (four counts), criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[407] Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant’s contention that he was deprived of his right to a public trial is not preserved for appellate review (see People v Casper, 287 AD2d 575 [2001]; People v Torres, 257 AD2d 639 [1999]), and we decline to address it in the exercise of our interest of justice jurisdiction (see CPL 470.05 [2]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions in his supplemental pro se brief are without merit. Ritter, J.P., Smith, H. Miller and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vatansever, 5 A.D.3d 406, 771 N.Y.S.2d 910 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

5 A.D.3d 406 (People v. Vatansever) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Miller
112 A.D.3d 856 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
People v. Walston
97 A.D.3d 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
People v. Borukhova
89 A.D.3d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
People v. George
79 A.D.3d 1148 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
People v. Alvarez
76 A.D.2d 1098 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)