People v. Vasquez
This text of 85 Misc. 2d 851 (People v. Vasquez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Indisputably defendant possessed bolt cutters and he and a coconspirator were observed in the process of cutting a bicycle chain with the bolt cutters, without permission of the owner of the bicycle, when dissuaded from completing the act. In this frame of reference, the bolt cutters clearly constituted burglar’s tools and we agree with the well-reasoned opinion of the Trial Judge (Julian A. Hertz, J.; 80 Misc 2d 21) that renunciation (Penal Law, § 40.10) was not a defense to the charge of possession of burglar’s tools (Penal Law, § 140.35) of which defendant was convicted (People v Lieberman, 3 NY2d 649; People v Nichols, 230 NY 221). [DIS-OP]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 Misc. 2d 851, 381 N.Y.S.2d 388, 1976 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vasquez-nyappterm-1976.