People v. Vasquez

250 A.D.2d 506, 671 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 93

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Bernard Fried, J.), rendered August 23, 1994, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of attempted robbery in the second degree, and sentencing him to 5 years probation, unanimously affirmed.

The existing record, which defendant has not sought to amplify by way of a motion pursuant to CPL 440.10 (see, People v Love, 57 NY2d 998), establishes that defendant received effective assistance of counsel in connection with his guilty plea (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404).

Defendant’s motion to vacate his guilty plea was properly denied without a hearing since the record shows his plea was knowing, intelligent and voluntary (see, People v Frederick, 45 NY2d 520). Defendant’s two written motions and appearance at sentencing provided him with ample opportunity to be heard (People v Gray, 235 AD2d 298). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Wallach, Tom and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 250 A.D.2d 506, 671 N.Y.S.2d 974, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

250 A.D.2d 506 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
People v. Love
443 N.E.2d 486 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
People v. Frederick
382 N.E.2d 1332 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Gray
235 A.D.2d 298 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)