People v. Vasquez

248 A.D.2d 737, 670 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3465
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 214 A.D.2d 93

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Giaccio, J.), rendered July 8, 1996, convicting him of escape in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are without merit (see, People v Pena, 50 NY2d 400, cert denied 449 US 1087; see also, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

Joy, J. P., Krausman, Florio and Luciano, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 248 A.D.2d 737, 670 N.Y.S.2d 336, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3465 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 737 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Pena
406 N.E.2d 1347 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)