People v. Vasquez

186 A.D.2d 440, 589 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12040
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 166 A.D.2d 194

Opinion

— Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Antonio I. Brandveen, J.), rendered April 4, 1990, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 3 to 6 years, unanimously affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the People and giving them the benefit of every reasonable inference (People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), we find that the evidence was sufficient as a matter of law to support the verdict finding defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. The issues raised by defendant concerning the credibility of the police witnesses, including their observations of the stolen vehicle and whether they saw him driving it, and [441]*441the details of the chase that preceded defendant’s apprehension, were properly placed before the jury, and we find no reason on the record before us to disturb its determination. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Wallach, Kupferman and Ross, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 186 A.D.2d 440, 589 N.Y.S.2d 769, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12040 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 440 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Malizia
465 N.E.2d 364 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)