People v. Vasquez

114 A.D.2d 917, 495 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53957
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vasquez. Read the opinion of the Court — 120 A.D.2d 757

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Alfano, J.), rendered March 18, 1982, convicting him of burglary in the third degree, possession of burglar’s tools, and attempted petit larceny, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Under the circumstances of this case, it cannot be said that the trial court abused its discretion in denying defendant’s motion for the assignment of new counsel, as the application was made just prior to the commencement of a Sandoval hearing and no valid reasons were given in support thereof (see, People v Tineo, 64 NY2d 531; People v Leach, 108 AD2d 871). Moreover, defendant’s assigned counsel provided him with effective assistance (see, People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137). Mangano, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vasquez, 114 A.D.2d 917, 495 N.Y.S.2d 659, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 53957 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

114 A.D.2d 917 (People v. Vasquez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Tineo
479 N.E.2d 795 (New York Court of Appeals, 1985)
People v. Leach
108 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1985)