People v. Varnum

53 Cal. 630, 1879 Cal. LEXIS 70
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1879·No. No. 10,377·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

By the Court :

The appeal from the order denying the new trial having been taken more than sixty days after the order was made, must be dismissed. (Penal Code, sec. 1239.)

The defendant, in addition to the plea of not guilty, pleaded a former acquittal. On the trial he introduced in evidence an indictment found against him for the same offense, and an order made by the District Court setting aside the indictment and sub[631]*631mitting the case to another grand jury. The prosecution introduced in evidence a notice and motion to set aside the indictment, on the ground that the grand jury had not been legally constituted, and it was admitted that the defendant was in custody when the first indictment was found. This evidence was insufficient to maintain the plea of former acquittal, and the Court did not err in instructing the jury to that effect.

The instructions which the Court refused to give, at the request of the defendant, were fully covered by the charge of the Court, so far as they correctly stated the law applicable to the case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Varnum, 53 Cal. 630, 1879 Cal. LEXIS 70 (Cal. 1879).

53 Cal. 630 (People v. Varnum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Benoit
514 P.2d 97 (California Supreme Court, 1973)
People v. Nelson
233 P. 406 (California Court of Appeal, 1924)
People v. Walker
64 P. 133 (California Supreme Court, 1901)
People v. Ammerman
50 P. 15 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
United States v. Camp
10 P. 226 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1886)
United States v. Cannon
4 Utah 122 (Utah Supreme Court, 1885)
People v. Ah Chung
54 Cal. 398 (California Supreme Court, 1880)