People v. Vargas

256 A.D.2d 601, 682 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13987
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vargas. Read the opinion of the Court — 244 A.D.2d 367

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blumenfeld, J.), rendered October 17, 1996, convicting him of reckless endangerment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence {see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Bracken, J. P., Ritter, Copertino and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vargas, 256 A.D.2d 601, 682 N.Y.S.2d 882, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13987 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

256 A.D.2d 601 (People v. Vargas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)