People v. Vargas

186 A.D.2d 834
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Vargas. Read the opinion of the Court — 169 A.D.2d 746

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Silver-man, J.), rendered July 21, 1989, convicting him of manslaughter in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

On appeal, the defendant contends that the court improvidently exercised its discretion when it refused to grant the defendant’s applications for a post-indictment preliminary hearing and to strike certain language from the indictment. However, the defendant is barred from raising these claims on appeal since, as a condition of his guilty plea, the defendant withdrew all of his motions, whether pending or decided. Accordingly, the defendant waived his right to challenge the denial of these applications on appeal.

The defendant pleaded guilty with the full understanding that he would receive the sentence that was actually imposed. Thus, he will not now be heard to complain that his sentence was excessive (see, People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816). Mangano, P. J., Sullivan, O’Brien, Ritter and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Vargas, 186 A.D.2d 834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

186 A.D.2d 834 (People v. Vargas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Kazepis
101 A.D.2d 816 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1984)