People v. VANWAGONER
This text of 706 N.W.2d 730 (People v. VANWAGONER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chad Nicholas VANWAGONER, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the March 10, 2005 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.
CORRIGAN, J., would grant leave to appeal to reconsider People v. Bender, 452 Mich. 594, 551 N.W.2d 71 (1996).
MARILYN J. KELLY, J., dissents and states as follows:
Defendant's confession was properly suppressed by the trial court under People v. Bender, 452 Mich. 594, 551 N.W.2d 71 (1996).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
706 N.W.2d 730, 474 Mich. 951, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vanwagoner-mich-2005.