People v. Vanness

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vanness

222 A.D.2d 910, 636 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13304

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 222 A.D.2d 910 (People v. Vanness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vanness, 222 A.D.2d 910, 636 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13304 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Lea-man, J.), rendered January 3, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree (two counts) and rape in the third degree.

Upon review of the record and the brief submitted by defense counsel, we find that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal. We have considered the claims raised [911]*911by defendant in his letter brief and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Columbia County (Lea-man, J.), rendered January 3, 1995, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crimes of rape in the first degree (two counts) and rape in the third degree.

Upon review of the record and the brief submitted by defense counsel, we find that there are no nonfrivolous issues that could be raised on appeal. We have considered the claims raised [911]*911by defendant in his letter brief and find them to be without merit. Accordingly, the judgment is affirmed and defense counsel’s application for leave to withdraw is granted.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, Mercure, Casey and Spain, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and application to be relieved of assignment granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

222 A.D.2d 910, 636 N.Y.S.2d 670, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13304, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vanness-nyappdiv-1995.