People v. Vanderpool

Circuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan

People v. Vanderpool

1 Mich. N.P. 73

CourtCircuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan

DecidedDecember 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 1 Mich. N.P. 73 (People v. Vanderpool) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Circuit Court of the 19th Circuit of Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vanderpool, 1 Mich. N.P. 73 (Mich. Super. Ct. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Gourt,

Ramsdell, J.

Under our statute defendants brought into court to answer to an information filed therein have a right to compulsory process to compel the attendance of their witnesses, after the filing of the information, and to sufficient length of time to have such process served and returned. The affidavit of defendant, as modified by the counter affidavit, shows good grounds for a postponement of the trial to a future day in term, but is not sufficient to entitle the defendant'to a continuance until the next term.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Gourt,

Ramsdell, J.

Under our statute defendants brought into court to answer to an information filed therein have a right to compulsory process to compel the attendance of their witnesses, after the filing of the information, and to sufficient length of time to have such process served and returned. The affidavit of defendant, as modified by the counter affidavit, shows good grounds for a postponement of the trial to a future day in term, but is not sufficient to entitle the defendant'to a continuance until the next term.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 Mich. N.P. 73, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vanderpool-micirct19-1869.