People v. Vanderah

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Vanderah

162 N.W.2d 150, 11 Mich. App. 722, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1373

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedJune 24, 1968

DocketDocket No. 4,070

StatusPublished

This text of 162 N.W.2d 150 (People v. Vanderah) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vanderah, 162 N.W.2d 150, 11 Mich. App. 722, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1373 (Mich. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. CLS 1961, § 257.625 (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 9.2325). He contends that the results of a consented-to blood test were inadmissible over his objection; that the trial court improperly prohibited defendant from impeaching a witness by use of an unauthenticated transcript from another trial and that defendant’s prior driving record was erroneously brought out on his cross-examination.

[724]*724CLS 1961, § 257.625a, as amended by PA 1964, No 104 (Stat Ann 1967 Cum Supp § 9.2325[1]) authorizes the admission in evidence of the results of such a test. The trial court’s rulings on the impeachment question and on defendant’s past driving record were proper.

Affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H, G-illis, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was convicted of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. CLS 1961, § 257.625 (Stat Ann 1960 Rev § 9.2325). He contends that the results of a consented-to blood test were inadmissible over his objection; that the trial court improperly prohibited defendant from impeaching a witness by use of an unauthenticated transcript from another trial and that defendant’s prior driving record was erroneously brought out on his cross-examination.

[724]*724CLS 1961, § 257.625a, as amended by PA 1964, No 104 (Stat Ann 1967 Cum Supp § 9.2325[1]) authorizes the admission in evidence of the results of such a test. The trial court’s rulings on the impeachment question and on defendant’s past driving record were proper.

Affirmed.

Quinn, P. J., and Fitzgerald and J. H, G-illis, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

162 N.W.2d 150, 11 Mich. App. 722, 1968 Mich. App. LEXIS 1373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vanderah-michctapp-1968.