People v. Vance
This text of 38 A.D.2d 875 (People v. Vance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: In reliance upon People v. Roston (37 A D 2d 624) the defendant claims he was not given an opportunity to admit or deny or stand mute with respect to the question of his addiction. In view of defendant’s admission in open court that he was an addict, we find no issue. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court convicting defendant of robbery, second degree and attempted criminal possession of forged instrument.) Present—Marsh, J. P., Witmer, Gabrielli, Moule and Henry, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 A.D.2d 875, 330 N.Y.S.2d 325, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5372, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vance-nyappdiv-1972.