People v. Vanbeverhoudt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vanbeverhoudt

203 A.D.2d 310, 612 N.Y.S.2d 903

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 4, 1994·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered September 11, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Goldberg, J.), rendered September 11, 1992, convicting him of robbery in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]). Thompson, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

People v. Vanbeverhoudt, 203 A.D.2d 310, 612 N.Y.S.2d 903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

203 A.D.2d 310 (People v. Vanbeverhoudt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related