People v. Van Vuren

212 A.D.2d 917, 623 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1581
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 16, 1995·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered January 24, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of burglary in the third degree.

We reject defendant’s claim that his negotiated sentence of 3 Vi to 7 years in prison is harsh and excessive and should be reduced in the interest of justice. Although defendant did receive the harshest permissible sentence as a second felony offender, he nevertheless received a substantial benefit by pleading as he did in satisfaction of a multicount indictment. Under the circumstances, we find no reason to disturb the sentence imposed by County Court.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Van Vuren, 212 A.D.2d 917, 623 N.Y.S.2d 170, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

212 A.D.2d 917 (People v. Van Vuren) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Green
285 A.D.2d 732 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
People v. Baker
225 A.D.2d 949 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
People v. Perez
221 A.D.2d 725 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)