People v. Van Steenburgh

1 Park. Cr. 39
CourtCourt Of Oyer And Terminer New York
DecidedSeptember 15, 1845
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 Park. Cr. 39 (People v. Van Steenburgh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court Of Oyer And Terminer New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Van Steenburgh, 1 Park. Cr. 39 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1845).

Opinion

Parker, Presiding Judge,

among other things, charged, that the offence of being armed and disguised, while engaged in a riot or in resisting the execution of legal process, as described in the seventh section of the act entitled an act to prevent persons being disguised and apmed, passed January, 28, 1845 (jSess. Laws of 1845, page 7), was a felony, and brought the offender within the definition of murder in the third subdivision of the 5th Section, Title 1, Chap, 1, Part 4 of the Revised Statutes, if the killing of a human being was perpetrated without a design to effect death by a person engaged in the commission of such offence; to which portion of the charge the prisoner’s counsel excepted.

The prisoner’s counsel contended that the offence created by the act of 1845, was not a felony, because its commission was not necessarily to be punished by imprisonment in the state prison, but might be punished by fine and imprisonment in a county jail. But the court held that the offence was felony, because it was liable by law ..to be punished by imprisonment n a state prison, and that it was none the less felony, because ,t was also liable to be punished by some milder punishment, [46]*46the statute definition of felony, in this state, being, “an offence, for which the offender, on conviction, shall be liable by law to be punished by death or imprisonment in the state prison” (2 R. S. 702).

And the court charged the jury, that if they were satisfied from the evidence, that the armed and disguised persons mentioned, by the witnesses, had assembled for the purpose of preventing a sale of the property levied on under the landlord’s warrant, either‘by force or by intimidation, and in the furtherance of that object some of them shot at the horses of Steele and Edgerton, though such shots were fired with the intention of killing the horses and not of killing Steele, yet if Steele was killed by such shots, the crime committed was murder, for which act each one of the armed and disguised persons so assembled was responsible.

The jury found the prisoner guilty of murder, and he was sentenced by the court to be executed on Saturday the 29th day of November, 1845.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Childs v. Knott
187 A.D. 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1919)
People v. Lyon
2 N.Y. Crim. 484 (New York Supreme Court, 1884)
Sisk v. State
9 Tex. Ct. App. 90 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1880)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Park. Cr. 39, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-steenburgh-nyoytermct-1845.