People v. Van Slyke

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Van Slyke

35 A.D.2d 1068, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 3, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 35 A.D.2d 1068 (People v. Van Slyke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Van Slyke, 35 A.D.2d 1068, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Memorandum: Defendant has made an informal application for coram, nobis relief ■based upon his allegation that he was denied counsel upon a review by the court of a judgment of May 10, 1955, of Onondaga County Court convicting him upon a plea of guilty of burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, second degree. The judgment was affirmed by us on December 23, 1959 (9 A D 2d 1022). The records of this court disclose that defendant moved pro se on July 8, 1958, for leave to appeal as a poor person but did not request assignment of counsel. The requested relief was granted (8 A D 2d 1001, 1002). Thereafter defendant served a brief of 57 pages with an appendix of 11 pages. We view his present contention that he was deprived of counsel on the appeal as wholly without merit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorandum: Defendant has made an informal application for coram, nobis relief ■based upon his allegation that he was denied counsel upon a review by the court of a judgment of May 10, 1955, of Onondaga County Court convicting him upon a plea of guilty of burglary, third degree, and grand larceny, second degree. The judgment was affirmed by us on December 23, 1959 (9 A D 2d 1022). The records of this court disclose that defendant moved pro se on July 8, 1958, for leave to appeal as a poor person but did not request assignment of counsel. The requested relief was granted (8 A D 2d 1001, 1002). Thereafter defendant served a brief of 57 pages with an appendix of 11 pages. We view his present contention that he was deprived of counsel on the appeal as wholly without merit.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

35 A.D.2d 1068, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-slyke-nyappdiv-1970.