People v. Van Oosterwyk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Van Oosterwyk

20 A.D.2d 710, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1964

StatusPublished

This text of 20 A.D.2d 710 (People v. Van Oosterwyk) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Van Oosterwyk, 20 A.D.2d 710, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, entered June 11, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered October 19, 1951 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the first degree, and unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, and imposing separate and consecutive sentences for each such crime. Order affirmed (see People ex rel. Maurer v. Jackson, 2 N Y 2d 259; People v. Black, 18 A D 2d 719; People ex rel. Concepcion v. Fay, 19 A D 2d 778; People ex rel. Eldard v. La Vallee, 15 A D 2d 611; People v. Gallo, 19 A D 2d 620). [For appeal from order denying prior coram nobis application, see People v. Van Oosterwyk, 18 A D 2d 841.] Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a coram nobis proceeding, defendant appeals from an order of the County Court, Nassau County, entered June 11, 1963, which denied without a hearing his application to vacate a judgment of said court, rendered October 19, 1951 on his plea of guilty, convicting him of attempted robbery in the first degree, assault in the first degree, and unlawfully carrying a concealed weapon, and imposing separate and consecutive sentences for each such crime. Order affirmed (see People ex rel. Maurer v. Jackson, 2 N Y 2d 259; People v. Black, 18 A D 2d 719; People ex rel. Concepcion v. Fay, 19 A D 2d 778; People ex rel. Eldard v. La Vallee, 15 A D 2d 611; People v. Gallo, 19 A D 2d 620). [For appeal from order denying prior coram nobis application, see People v. Van Oosterwyk, 18 A D 2d 841.] Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Hill and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 710, 247 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-oosterwyk-nyappdiv-1964.