People v. Van Gorder

281 A.D.2d 944, 722 N.Y.S.2d 844, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2883
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 21, 2001·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of attempted rape in the first degree (Penal Law §§ 110.00, 130.35) and endangering the welfare of a child (Penal Law § 260.10 [1]), defendant contends that the verdict is against the weight of the evidence. We disagree. At trial, the People presented the testimony of the victim and a witness concerning the attempted rape of the victim, and an expert explained the victim’s three-year delay in reporting the crime. It cannot be said that the jury failed to give the evidence the weight it should be accorded (see, People v Bleakley, 69 NY2d 490, 495). The sentence is neither unduly harsh nor severe. (Appeal from Judgment of Monroe County Court, Marks, J. — Attempted Rape, 1st Degree.) Present— Pigott, Jr., P. J., Green, Kehoe, Burns and Lawton, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Van Gorder, 281 A.D.2d 944, 722 N.Y.S.2d 844, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2883 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

281 A.D.2d 944 (People v. Van Gorder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Woods
26 A.D.3d 818 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
Van Gorder v. ALLERD
387 F. Supp. 2d 251 (W.D. New York, 2005)