People v. Van Aalst

211 A.D. 861
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1924·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

It was necessary, to warrant a conviction, that tbe fact of tbe assault should be proved by evidence from another source than tbe defendant’s confession. Tbe record is barren of any such proof, save tbe circumstances that tbe complainant bad reported tbe defendant to tbe school authorities for an infraction of tbe rules, and that tbe defendant was present at tbe scene of tbe alleged assault. (People v. Roach, 215 N. Y. 592, 600; People v. Krauss, 192 App. Div. 403.) Tbe judgment of conviction of tbe Court of Special Sessions is, therefore, reversed on tbe law and facts, and tbe defendant discharged.

Kelly, P. J., Rich, Manning, Young and Kapper, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Van Aalst, 211 A.D. 861 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1924).

211 A.D. 861 (People v. Van Aalst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Al Hatem
194 Misc. 97 (New York Court of General Session of the Peace, 1949)