People v. Van Aalst
This text of 211 A.D. 861 (People v. Van Aalst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was necessary, to warrant a conviction, that tbe fact of tbe assault should be proved by evidence from another source than tbe defendant’s confession. Tbe record is barren of any such proof, save tbe circumstances that tbe complainant bad reported tbe defendant to tbe school authorities for an infraction of tbe rules, and that tbe defendant was present at tbe scene of tbe alleged assault. (People v. Roach, 215 N. Y. 592, 600; People v. Krauss, 192 App. Div. 403.) Tbe judgment of conviction of tbe Court of Special Sessions is, therefore, reversed on tbe law and facts, and tbe defendant discharged.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
211 A.D. 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-van-aalst-nyappdiv-1924.