People v. Vallejo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Vallejo

194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6159

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 419 (People v. Vallejo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Vallejo, 194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6159 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered May 4, 1992, convicting defendant of robbery in the first and second degrees, and burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 Vs to 10 years, 2 Vs to 7 years and 2 Vs to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial by several of the trial prosecutor’s comments is unpreserved for review as a matter of law, and we decline to review in the interest of justice. Were we to review this contention, we would find defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by any single comment, or the cumulative effect of all of the comments to which defendant takes issue on appeal. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Phylis Skloot Bamberger, J.), rendered May 4, 1992, convicting defendant of robbery in the first and second degrees, and burglary in the second degree, and sentencing him to concurrent terms of 3 Vs to 10 years, 2 Vs to 7 years and 2 Vs to 7 years, respectively, unanimously affirmed.

Defendant’s contention that he was denied a fair trial by several of the trial prosecutor’s comments is unpreserved for review as a matter of law, and we decline to review in the interest of justice. Were we to review this contention, we would find defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by any single comment, or the cumulative effect of all of the comments to which defendant takes issue on appeal. Concur— Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 955, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6159, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-vallejo-nyappdiv-1993.