People v. Valle

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Valle

184 A.D.2d 447, 587 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8601

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 30, 1992

StatusPublished

This text of 184 A.D.2d 447 (People v. Valle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Valle, 184 A.D.2d 447, 587 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8601 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin R. Weissberg, J.), rendered May 31, 1988, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a [448]*448term of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years, unanimously dismissed. The order of this court dated November 16, 1989, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for an extension of time in which to appeal is vacated.

Since defendant’s August 1989 motion for an extension of time to take an appeal was made more than one year after his time for taking an appeal had expired, jurisdiction to hear the appeal is lacking, and the appeal must be dismissed (CPL 460.30; People v Torres, 179 AD2d 358). Were we to address the merits we would affirm. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Franklin R. Weissberg, J.), rendered May 31, 1988, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of robbery in the first degree, and sentencing him to a [448]*448term of imprisonment of 4 to 12 years, unanimously dismissed. The order of this court dated November 16, 1989, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for an extension of time in which to appeal is vacated.

Since defendant’s August 1989 motion for an extension of time to take an appeal was made more than one year after his time for taking an appeal had expired, jurisdiction to hear the appeal is lacking, and the appeal must be dismissed (CPL 460.30; People v Torres, 179 AD2d 358). Were we to address the merits we would affirm. Concur — Murphy, P. J., Sullivan, Carro, Rosenberger and Rubin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

184 A.D.2d 447, 587 N.Y.S.2d 147, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-valle-nyappdiv-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack