People v. Valentine

23 A.D.3d 417, 803 N.Y.S.2d 432
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Valentine. Read the opinion of the Court — 15 A.D.3d 463

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lott, J.), rendered April 12, 2004, convicting him of assault in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he was not denied [418]*418the effective assistance of counsel. Viewing the record as a whole, the defendant received meaningful representation (see People v Baldi, 54 NY2d 137 [1981]). Unsuccessful trial strategies and tactics do not constitute ineffective assistance of counsel (see People v Adams, 12 AD3d 523 [2004]; People v Mejias, 278 AD2d 249 [2000]). Cozier, J.P. Ritter, Spolzino and Lunn, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentine, 23 A.D.3d 417, 803 N.Y.S.2d 432 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

23 A.D.3d 417 (People v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Baldi
429 N.E.2d 400 (New York Court of Appeals, 1981)
People v. Adams
12 A.D.3d 523 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)
People v. Mejias
278 A.D.2d 249 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)