People v. Valentine

227 A.D.2d 720, 642 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5039
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Valentine. Read the opinion of the Court — 212 A.D.2d 399

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Schenectady County (Harrigan, J.), rendered December 19, 1994, convicting defendant upon his plea of guilty of the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree.

In accordance with a plea bargain, defendant pleaded guilty to criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree in full satisfaction of a 15-count indictment charging him with various drug related crimes and received the bargained for sentence of an indeterminate term of imprisonment of 6 to 12 years. On appeal, he contends that he was deprived of the effective assistance of counsel. We reject this argument as it is unsupported by the record and, moreover, defendant received an advantageous plea and sentence, considering that he could have received several consecutive sentences of 121/2 to 25 years (see, People v Ford, 86 NY2d 397, 404). We further reject defendant’s argument that his sentence was harsh and excessive given his criminal history and that he agreed to the sentence as part of his plea bargain.

Cardona, P. J., Mikoll, White, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentine, 227 A.D.2d 720, 642 N.Y.S.2d 564, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5039 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

227 A.D.2d 720 (People v. Valentine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ford
657 N.E.2d 265 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)