People v. Valentine

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Valentine

127 A.D.2d 622, 511 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43108

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 2, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 622 (People v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Valentine, 127 A.D.2d 622, 511 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43108 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), all rendered October 4, 1985, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts; one each under indictments Nos. 4430/83 and 4440/83), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts; one each under indictments Nos. 1995/85 and 1998/85), upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from four judgments of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Maraño, J.), all rendered October 4, 1985, convicting her of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (two counts; one each under indictments Nos. 4430/83 and 4440/83), and criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree (two counts; one each under indictments Nos. 1995/85 and 1998/85), upon her pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Ordered that the judgments are affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Kunzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 622, 511 N.Y.S.2d 556, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43108, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-valentine-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack