People v. Valentin

29 A.D.3d 923, 815 N.Y.S.2d 262
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Valentin. Read the opinion of the Court — 1 A.D.2d 982

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Blackburne, J.), rendered January 9, 2004, convicting him of robbery in the first degree (two counts) and robbery in the second degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[924]*924Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Evidence that the defendant engaged in a robbery with an uncharged accomplice was relevant and admissible to prove that he committed the robbery while “aided by another person actually present” (see Penal Law § 160.10 [1]; People v Hinton, 252 AD2d 428, 429 [1998]; People v Hurd, 160 AD2d 199, 199-200 [1990]). Thus, the admission of such evidence did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial. Miller, J.P., Ritter, Skelos and Lifson, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentin, 29 A.D.3d 923, 815 N.Y.S.2d 262 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2006).

29 A.D.3d 923 (People v. Valentin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Hurd
160 A.D.2d 199 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
People v. Hinton
252 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)