People v. Valentin

237 A.D.2d 314, 655 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2092
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Valentin. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 A.D.2d 509

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Curci, J.), rendered June 13, 1995, convicting him of robbery in the second degree (two counts) and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[315]*315Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).

The defendant’s remaining contention is without merit. Mangano, P. J., Bracken, Rosenblatt and Miller, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Valentin, 237 A.D.2d 314, 655 N.Y.S.2d 379, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

237 A.D.2d 314 (People v. Valentin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)