People v. Valentin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Valentin

53 A.D.2d 653, 385 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 14, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A.D.2d 653 (People v. Valentin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Valentin, 53 A.D.2d 653, 385 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 25, 1974, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By order dated December 16, 1974, this court remanded the case to the County Court, Nassau County, for a hearing "to determine whether the postindictment delay was occasioned by the District Attorney”, and directed that the appeal be held in abeyance in the interim (People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906). The hearing has been held and the minutes and the determination made thereon have been forwarded to this court. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered January 25, 1974, convicting him of criminally selling a dangerous drug in the third degree (two counts) and criminal possession of a dangerous drug in the fourth degree (two counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. By order dated December 16, 1974, this court remanded the case to the County Court, Nassau County, for a hearing "to determine whether the postindictment delay was occasioned by the District Attorney”, and directed that the appeal be held in abeyance in the interim (People v Valentin, 46 AD2d 906). The hearing has been held and the minutes and the determination made thereon have been forwarded to this court. Judgment affirmed. No opinion. Latham, Acting P. J., Cohalan, Rabin, Shapiro and Titone, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A.D.2d 653, 385 N.Y.S.2d 951, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13384, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-valentin-nyappdiv-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack