People v. Urquidez
This text of 84 A.D.2d 795 (People v. Urquidez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Brennan, J.), rendered July 24, 1979, convicting him of rape in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and sentencing him as a second felony offender to an indeterminate term of IVz to 15 years’ imprisonment. Judgment modified, on the law, by reducing the sentence to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 5 to 10 years. As so modified, judgment affirmed. A guilty plea induced by an unfulfilled sentence promise must either be vacated or the promise honored (People v Selikoff, 35 NY2d 227). Thus we now reduce defendant’s sentence to 5 to 10 years which is the maximum term consonant with both section 70.06 (subd 4, par [h]) of the Penal Law, mandating a two to one ratio between the maximum and minimum of an indeterminate term of imprisonment accorded a second felony offender, and the terms of the original plea bargain (see People v Scott, 72 AD2d 754; People v Diaz, 56 AD2d 827). Hopkins, J. P., Damiani, Titone and Rabin, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
84 A.D.2d 795, 444 N.Y.S.2d 16, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-urquidez-nyappdiv-1981.