People v. Uribe

142 A.D.3d 680, 36 N.Y.S.3d 831
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Uribe. Read the opinion of the Court — 109 A.D.3d 844
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 24, 2016·No. 2013-02910·Published

Opinion

— Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Holder, J.), imposed February 5, 2013, upon his plea of guilty, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

We agree with the defendant that the purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Guarchaj, 122 AD3d 878 [2014]; People v Pelaez, 100 AD3d 803 [2012]).

However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People *681 v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

Eng, P.J., Chambers, Austin, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Uribe, 142 A.D.3d 680, 36 N.Y.S.3d 831 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

142 A.D.3d 680 (People v. Uribe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Guarchaj
122 A.D.3d 878 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
People v. Pelaez
100 A.D.3d 803 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)