People v. Urena

2017 NY Slip Op 3022, 149 A.D.3d 985, 50 N.Y.S.3d 298
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 19, 2017
Docket2014-09794
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 3022 (People v. Urena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Urena, 2017 NY Slip Op 3022, 149 A.D.3d 985, 50 N.Y.S.3d 298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Koenderman, J.), rendered March 31, 2014, as amended September 29, 2014 (Zaro, J.), convicting him of attempted sodomy in the first degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment, as amended, is affirmed.

The defendant’s purported waiver of his right to appeal was invalid (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 256 [2006]; People v Brown, 122 AD3d 133 [2014]) and, thus, does not preclude review of his excessive sentence claim. However, the sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions, raised in his pro se supplemental brief, are without merit (see CPL 30.10 [3] [f]; L 1996, ch 122, § 1).

Eng, P.J., Hall, Cohen, LaSalle and Connolly, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Brown
122 A.D.3d 133 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 NY Slip Op 3022, 149 A.D.3d 985, 50 N.Y.S.3d 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-urena-nyappdiv-2017.