People v. Urena

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Urena

266 A.D.2d 572, 698 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12194

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 572 (People v. Urena) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Urena, 266 A.D.2d 572, 698 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12194 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed October 29, 1996, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 96-00080, on the ground that the sentence is excessive, and purported appeal from a sentence of the same court, also imposed October 29, 1996, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 96-00092.

[573]*573Ordered that the purported appeal from the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 96-00092 is dismissed, as the defendant did not file a notice of appeal from that sentence; and it is further,

Ordered that the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 96-00080 is affirmed. No opinion. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the County Court, Rockland County (Nelson, J.), imposed October 29, 1996, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 96-00080, on the ground that the sentence is excessive, and purported appeal from a sentence of the same court, also imposed October 29, 1996, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree under Indictment No. 96-00092.

[573]*573Ordered that the purported appeal from the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 96-00092 is dismissed, as the defendant did not file a notice of appeal from that sentence; and it is further,

Ordered that the sentence imposed under Indictment No. 96-00080 is affirmed. No opinion. Mangano, P. J., O’Brien, Sullivan, Goldstein and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 572, 698 N.Y.S.2d 911, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-urena-nyappdiv-1999.