People v. Urbaez

74 A.D.3d 1252, 902 N.Y.S.2d 417

This text of 74 A.D.3d 1252 (People v. Urbaez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Urbaez, 74 A.D.3d 1252, 902 N.Y.S.2d 417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered August 7, 2008, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CEL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for [1253]*1253appellate review. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
74 A.D.3d 1252, 902 N.Y.S.2d 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-urbaez-nyappdiv-2010.