People v. Urbaez

74 A.D.3d 1252, 902 N.Y.S.2d 417

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Dutchess County (Dolan, J.), rendered August 7, 2008, convicting him of promoting prison contraband in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon our independent review pursuant to CEL 470.15 (5), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are unpreserved for [1253] appellate review. Mastro, J.P., Covello, Belen and Hall, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Urbaez, 74 A.D.3d 1252, 902 N.Y.S.2d 417 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

74 A.D.3d 1252 (People v. Urbaez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Romero
859 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)